SCVWD waste fraud @SCVWD 5 24 16 6pm

SORRY SCVWD DOES THIS TO CONFUSE THE PUBLIC AND WASTER YOUR MONEY!

BE ON THE LOOKOUT A PERSON WHO RETIRED FROM SCVWD BECAUSE OF FRANK FUNG AND GEORGE KAMENJATI.

WELCOME TO THE GOLDEN SPIGOT, WHERE WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE IS RAMPANT!

THEY NOT ONLY LIE ABOUT BOARDROOM COST, REPAIRS, HD, BLUERAY(WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN USED) AND WHO WANTS TO LOOK AT CRABBY OLD PEOPLE IN HD WASTE YOUR TAX DOLLAR? THEY SAY 600K WATCH YOUR TAX DOLLAR GO TO 2 MILLION IF THEY CAN GET THE ROOM DONE IN 2 MONTHS, WE WILL SEE WHO HAS THE LAST LAUGH.

DEC 11 2012 

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=962&meta_id=105367 ITEM 1.4 FIRST SPEACH    

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2012_Published_Meetings//MG47843/AS47844/AS47848/AI49234/DO49236/1.PDF

 

MK the pdf could have been scanned and posted, i have seen many others larger than mine, with maps etc.
so if i provide links as they are all public can those be scanned and posted?  on 
my speech is below, they have all been online before???? IN THE EVENT THAT MY TAXI OR RIDE TO SCVWD IS LATE WILL THIS BE READ AS OTHERS ARE READ?
 
1/22/2016

you posted 2 large pdfs

https://scvwd.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2573905&GUID=59713FE2-C88D-4193-8EC0-56C2E5FC4C9D&Options=&Search=

  this has item 8.1 a and b


https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/scvwd-pgoeltz-10-28-2014.pdf
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/scvwd-ray-10-28-2014.pdf
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/handouts-agenda-item-5-2.pdf
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/joe-handout.pdf
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/diversityaudit2012.pdf
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/handouts-agenda-item-5-2.pdf
http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2012_Published_Meetings//MG47843/AS47844/AS47848/AI49234/DO49236/1.PDF

i did not see my pdf with my letter as you said it would be???  all i saw in the packet was my letter?
 
so  which pdf were too large? could not have been all of them 
 
do i need to resend all the pdf’s again?
 
DEAR CHAIR, DIRECTORS AND STAFF!
 
1. DID WE NOT OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE ON
FC 1025 (09-20-13)
Meeting Date:
10-14-14
Agenda Item:
Unclassified Manager:
S. Tikekar
Extension:
2424
Director(s):
2. WHY ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING?

NOT THAT THE PUBLIC COMMENT IS WANTED OR EVER USED?
LIKE FLUORIDE, ETC.
Resolution Providing for the Notice of Time and Place of the Public Hearing on the
Engineer’s Report for the Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization Project, Project No.
60101011 (San Jose) THIS WAS NEVER CLOSED?? FROM 10/14
3. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING TO YOUR OWN EMPLOYEES, PUBLIC COMMENT.
4. IT’S APPARENT YOU RATHER SPEND MONEY WITH TOTAL DISREGARD FOR
THE HOMEOWNER!
5. ALL I CAN SAY IS GOOD LUCK, YOU HAVE KAMENJATIS
(IT) HANDPICKED FIRM TELLING YOU WANT YOU WANT TO HEAR!
6. GOOD LUCK USING SKYPE, INSTEAD OF YOUR TOP NOTCH TANDBERG 5000!
WHICH USES DEDICATED ISDN 1ST

and

INTERNET

2ND BUT NO LOSS WITH

ISDN SKYPE IS FOR HOMES NOT WORK.
7. AND GOOD LUCK KEEP IT UNDER A MILLION DOLLARS!
8. IF YOU WOULD HAVE LISTENED TO THE TECH AND COMMENTS YOU WOULD
SEE BLUERAY HAS NEVER BEEN USED, THE LCD ARE ALREADY DIGITAL!
9. AND YOU ARE TOSSING 100k OF EQUIPMENT OUT.
10. THE DISTRICT HAS NOT SPENT 183K ON REPAIRS….. BUT UPGRADES, IF
YOU WOULD LISTEN!
“IT has spent over $185,000 on Band-Aids, and repairs since 2006” this is upgrades pull the pr.


11. OVER 40K OF EQUIPMENT WILL BE TOSSED OUT GK HAD ORDERED IN
2012, SHAME. AND TONS OF GOOD RACK EQUIPMENT ALL DIGITAL.
12. WHAT IS FUNNY, IS YOUR TIMELINE, AND BROADCAST, HD (GOOD LUCK
ON THOSE CLOSE UP SHOTS)!
13. SURE THE DISTRICT HAS THE BANDWIDTH, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE
PUBLIC?
14. THE CABLE COMPANY IS ALREADY WIRED INTO THE BUILDING YOU
SHOULD HAVE ASKED?
15. ALL I CAN SAY AND OTHERS ALSO, IS GOOD LUCK ON
PROGRAMMING( DON’T COPY ANDERSON WORK) AND THE ACOUSTICS! AND
MANY OTHER ITEMS, AS THIS IS RUSHED THROUGH, YOU HAVE NO IDEA
WHAT YOU ARE GETTING INTO, BUT AT LEAST YOU CAN FIRE THE 5TH IT
MANAGER
16. AND NO QUESTION

s

FOR STAFF OR THE ENGINEER, WE HAVE SHOWN

TONS OF DOCUMENTS AS DUG MUIRHEAD HAS BROUGHT
TO LIGHT THE SHADY MASTER PLANS AND FUNDS

.
If you have ever been hooded winked it’s now, why do you think ray and i have been submitting papers on what kamenjati/fung/ravi.and ashu have done( stopped maintenance so the room will fail, paid contracts that have not been done just like rmc.)
has anyone from it staff told you about speaking into a microphone ( have they let me explain it or ray, have you seen members of Congress speak on c span? they speak directly into the mic, if others are not speaking directly into the mic, that also means YOU will not be able to hear them)   not saying your wrong but staff has not instructed you on use, nor have they let ray fix problems.  I was told when i was there not to talk to you about equipment.
 

The Stakeholders Matrix that is submitted for Item 8.1 for Board Meeting 3-8-2016 is from 12-6-2013. Where is the Stakeholders matrix mentioned in the Handout from the IT Ad Hoc Committee meeting June 22, 2015 item 5.2 (page 79) which is dated 4-1-15? Why is the updated version not submitted presently for the agenda item for the Board Members and Publics information?  I could go on and on but this is not read and you due as you please, so good luck.

thank you……
PAUL GOELTZ
 
WISH TO SPEAK, DURING PUBLIC AND ON THIS ITEM
IMG_6121

THE WANTED POSTER GIVEN TO SJPD ON 3 8 2016 SCVWD RETIREE, TALKED AND THEY DONT WANT ME THERE

DSC00516

This is your old av Sr tech, if you have ever been hooded winked it’s now, why do you think ray and i have been submitting papers on what kamenjati/fung/ravi.and ashu have done( stopped maintenance so the room will fail, paid contracts that have not been done just like rmc.)
has anyone from it staff told you about speaking into a microphone ( have they let me explain it or ray, have you seen members of Congress speak on c span? they speak directly into the mic, if others are not speaking directly into the mic, that also means YOU will not be able to hear them)   not saying your wrong but staff has not instructed you on use, nor have they let ray fix problems.  I was told when i was there not to talk to you about equipment.
 

The Stakeholders Matrix that is submitted for Item 8.1 for Board Meeting 3-8-2016 is from 12-6-2013. Where is the Stakeholders matrix mentioned in the Handout from the IT Ad Hoc Committee meeting June 22, 2015 item 5.2 (page 79) which is dated 4-1-15? Why is the updated version not submitted presently for the agenda item for the Board Members and Publics information?

Agenda

http://valleywater.org/About/ITAdHocAgendaMinutes.aspx


I WILL COME TO ANY MEETING AND SHOW YOU THE EQUIPMENT, THE PURCHASE PAPERS, AND SUPPLY  CONTRACTORS THAT WILL TELL YOU WE CAN SUPPORT THIS SYSTEM, OR WE INSTALLED THAT EQUIPMENT.
1. Has staff explained that the amx system can do voting, and request to speak as it does now. and that there is an open po with the programmer to have joystick control of ea camera,(( but not done as GK stopped work/SEE EMAIL)  Ask about the 10k of amx processing equipment gk had me buy before i retired/was forced out, but never installed)
2.  HD is not the answer as most people do not have fast internet connections and its bells  and whistles,  flat panels, you have flat panels.
3.  Has staff explained if you want to Skype you can do it now as the room is full of computers hooked to the system.  all you need is a staff person to handle it, that’s free, just download app, but you don’t need Skype, you have a video conferencing system(tandberg now Cisco)( can handle ip, isdn and phone calls  COST 77k$ per Larry wilson).


4.  Has staff told you that people can already call in as we installed a state of the art digital video conferencing system,  this equipment is still up to date.
5.  Has staff been truthful in say the system is 100 % analog no i replaced 75% of the audio and video processing so it is digital, as is the recording of the meetings  both video and audio.  This system can also record committee meetings, just turn cameras, and start recording. this is also digital video record, and audio is also captured on sd cards.  Also digital.
6.  HAS staff explained to you that we can do split screens, we can enlarge images, we can send, hook up and piece of equipment that comes into that board room, from digital to analog.
7. Has staff explained what the district cost will be, you cannot get that room to be rebuilt on 700k plus add the engineer’s cost, staff time already, and by the time the punch list is worked out it will be like the first board room where you sit costing over 2 million, you will want your own person running it not some temp/CONTRACTOR as is going to happen, but the sad thing is, yes its a nice room, but its not a room made for those types of meetings.
8.  This is my tax money just as much as yours, as Gary told ngoc why has nobody been fired, well why did George stop work in the board room, and not get fired? see the email in attachments.
why was George allowed to discuss with ray my marriage and medical problems, why  is George allowed to take av techs around the lake to tell them how things will be?
why has George been allowed to manipulate the techs, contractors and his staff, they are afraid of him.
9.  Has any of the staff told you that of 2 years ago the wireless microphone (frequencies) were sold by the FCC, which means that you could be fined, i told George of this before i left, as they did it with the original frequencies, so cell phones can have more bandwidth.
10.  I enjoyed working here but when the av MANAGEMENT cannot do there job, this is what happens.
11.  WHO IS PAYING FOR ELECTRICAL, WOODWORK, DRYWALL, PAINTING, BE SURE TO ADD THAT COST.
12.  IF PHIL IS A CTS WHY DID HE NOT SEE THE WIRELESS MICS WERE NOT SOLD OFF 2 YRS AGO MY THE FCC, ADD ANOTHER 20K, FOR  JUST 4 WIRELESS HANDHELDS AND LAVS?
13.  Staff Training: Clear Presentations & Mic Technique x OK Training/procedural Issue, MAYBE STAFF TRAINING AND A COUPLE OF UPGRADES IS ALL YOU NEED. Also what wrong with the beyer goosenecks, its what the board wanted, and if told how to use them they work fine.
14.  Simplify Rear Round Table  MOUNT CEILING THIS EQUIPMENT WAS BOUGHT IN 2011.
15..Provide Better Lighting From Front, Side and Back of Subjects x OK New cameras will operate better in low light conditions,  THE CAMERAS ARE FINE IS THE LIGHTING AS WAS TOLD TO TOM SPADA WHEN I WAS THERE.
16.  I WILL NOT EVEN BOTHER GOING OVER THE MATRIX AS MOST IF NOT ALL OF THAT CAN HAPPEN NOW.   IF YOU WOULD HAVE LISTEN TO THE AV TECH INPUTS (SEE HANDOUT), THEN MAYBE YOU MIGHT BE CLOSE.   I WISH YOU LUCK.   MOST IF NOT ALL OF THIS CAN HAPPEN NOW,  HOWEVER YOU HAVE NOT GOT THE RIGHT COSTS, NOR THE RIGHT ENGINEERS, NOR HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF THE USER’s, WHO STILL DON’T USE THE EQUIPMENT RIGHT. NOR HAVE YOU ASKED STAFF WHAT CAN THIS EQUIPMENT DO?
HURRY YOU STILL HAVE TIME TO ADD TO THE COST, FIGURE THE ACOUSTICS OUT, AND ASK HOW DID WE GET ENGINEERS WITH NO BOARDROOM EXPERIENCE.  Remember if you cannot grasp simple equipment, how will you manage higher tech?
Does staff and board  read employee reports, or any of the tapes, PR’s, expense reports etc.  we have provided links rebuttals but the board, managers just disregard the info, and keep wasting tax money.
 

AS DUG MUIRHEAD SAID YES I SAW THE SYSTEM break, SO IT SHOULD BE REPLACED, WELL WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF THAT, GEORGE KAMENJATI STOPPED ALL WORK IN THE ROOM SO THINGS WILL FAIL, HE WOULD NOT EVEN LET RAY GO PICK UP THE TECH DRAWINGS FROM ME AT HOME, NOR GET ALL THE KEYS.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION NO. 16- PROVIDING FOR THE NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE BOARDROOM TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) has been duly and regularly established and exists pursuant to the provisions of the Santa Clara Valley Water District Act; and WHEREAS, the District has proceeded with feasibility and alternatives analysis for the Project objectives to be attained, and has documented the alternatives analysis and decision criteria and comparisons in a Planning Study Report prepared by the District’s Information Technology Staff and dated May 10th, 2016; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of May 2016, the Engineer’s Report for the Proposed Project prepared by the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Information Technology Staff, titled “Boardroom Technology Upgrade” and dated April 12th, 2016, was made available to the Board of Directors, showing: 1. A general description of the proposed Project; 2. A general description and maps showing the location of the proposed Project; and 3. An estimate of the cost of the proposed Project and means of financing these costs. WHEREAS, Section 12 of the District Act requires the Board to conduct a public hearing to hear testimony on a project when: (1) the project is new construction and (2) the project is funded by single or joint zones of benefits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Santa Clara Valley Water District as follows: SECTION 1 1. That the 24th day of May 2016 at 6:00 p.m., in the Boardroom of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, be fixed as the time and place for a public hearing on the Engineer’s Report and this Board of Directors will consider all written and oral comments to the proposed Project; and 2. That the Engineer’s Report for the proposed Project, titled “Boardroom Technology Upgrade Project Engineer’s Report” and dated April 12th, 2016, is available for public inspection by any interested person at Santa Clara Valley Water District’s office, 5700 Almaden Expressway, San Jose, CA 95118, and on the District’s websitehttp://www.valleywater.org/PublicReviewDocuments.aspx. Providing for the Notice of Time and Place of Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for the Boardroom Technology Upgrade Project Resolution No. 16- RL13319.docx 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of Santa Clara Valley Water District by the following vote on May 10, 2016

Public hearing notice Topic: Boardroom Technology Upgrade Project Who: Santa Clara Valley Water District What: Public hearing on the Engineer’s Report When: May 24, 2016; Item is time certain at 6:00 P.M. Place: Santa Clara Valley Water District; Boardroom 5700 Almaden Expressway, San Jose, Ca 95118 Why: The proposed work of improvement is described in the Boardroom Technology Upgrade Project Engineer’s Report. The Report is on file at the Clerk of the Board of Directors, 5700 Almaden Expressway, San Jose, California and on Valley Water’s website:http://www.valleywater.org/PublicReviewDocuments.aspx The objective of the project is to upgrade the existing 17 years old audiovisual system and bring it to the latest standards of Video technology. At the time and place fixed for the public hearing, the Board of Directors will receive comments on the Engineer’s Report for the Project. After considering the comments, the Board will decide whether or not to proceed with the Project. For more information about this hearing or this Project, contact Sudhanshu Tikekar at (408) 630-2424. Reasonable efforts will be made to accommodate persons with disabilities wishing to attend this public hearing. For additional information on attending this hearing, including requesting accommodations for disabilities or interpreter assistance, please contact the Office of the Clerk of the Board at (408) 265-2607, ext. 2277, at least three business days prior to the hearing.

why dont they come out and say paul goeltz fucked it up, and got screwed by george kamenjati who tossed out 10% of my personal items. AND YOUR CLAIMS MANAGER SAID HE WOULD ASK TECH BUT NEVER DID?????

https://scvwd.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=459787&GUID=990BC7C8-8851-489D-9FA1-C87E7AD681BF

ALL PDF BELOW AS THE PUBLIC AGENCY WILL NOT PRINT THEM OR MAKE AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC

Attachment 4 Project Delivery Process Chart

Attachment 3

ResolutionAttachment 2

Public Hearing Notice

Attachment 1 Engineer’s Report

Agenda

Attachment 4 Handout 8.1-A – Comment, P

DO_55681

DO_55650

Attachment 5 030816 Handout 8 1-B Goeltz062215

IT Ad Hoc Comm Agenda

1993-1994 Grand Jury Final Report

2005-2006 Grand Jury Final Report

2008-2009 Grand Jury Report – Part 4

2003-2004 Grand Jury Final Report

1999-2000 Grand Jury Final Report

2008-2009 Grand Jury Report – Part 3

2001-2002 Grand Jury Final Report

081115 IT Ad Hoc Comm

Agenda

Attachment 1 Handout 2

2008-2009 Grand Jury Report – Part 1

2008-2009 Grand Jury Report – Part 2

2008-2009 Grand Jury Report – Part 1

Handouts-Agenda Item 5.2scvwd ray 10 28 2014

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014

Resolution Providing for the Notice of Time and Place of the Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for the Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization GOLDIE FUNG KAMENJATI

JOE HANDOUTDO_56501

DiversityAudit2012062215

IT Ad Hoc Comm Mins

sscistudy1

scvwd rayscvwd ray 10 28 2014

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014

Resolution Providing for the Notice of Time and Place of the Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for the Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization GOLDIE FUNG KAMENJATI

JOE HANDOUT

DiversityAudit2012

Agenda (2)Agenda (3)Agenda (4)Agenda

062215 IT Ad Hoc Comm Agenda with rays input on matrix

DiversityAudit2012 explains a lot about scvwd

 

https://pgoeltz.wordpress.com/2016/03/11/santa-clara-valley-water-district-boardroom-3-8-2016/

https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/scvwd-pgoeltz-10-28-2014.pdf

https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/scvwd-ray-10-28-2014.pdf

https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/joe-handout.pdf

https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/handouts-agenda-item-5-2.pdf

SCVWD LIES ABOUT BOARDROOM 4 8 16 6PM

                                        SCVWD LIES ABOUT BOARDROOM

Featured Image -- 63

                     Boardroom Audio Visual Modernization Project Engineer’s Report.

LINKS WORK MAY NEED TO FOLLOW LINK OR COPY/PASTE

IMG_6121

VIEW THE PERJURY
Dear SCVWD  honorable board chair, members and staff.

Boardroom Audio Visual Modernization Project Engineer’s LIES.

 

This is your old av Sr tech, if you have ever been hooded winked it’s now, why do you think ray and i have been submitting papers on what kamenjati/fung/ravi.and ashu have done( stopped maintenance so the room will fail, paid contracts that have not been done just like rmc.)
has anyone from it staff told you about speaking into a microphone ( have they let me explain it or ray, have you seen members of Congress speak on c span? they speak directly into the mic, if others are not speaking directly into the mic, that also means YOU will not be able to hear them)   not saying your wrong but staff has not instructed you on use, nor have they let ray fix problems.  I was told when i was there not to talk to you about equipment.
 

The Stakeholders Matrix that is submitted for Item 8.1 for Board Meeting 3-8-2016 is from 12-6-2013. Where is the Stakeholders matrix mentioned in the Handout from the IT Ad Hoc Committee meeting June 22, 2015 item 5.2 (page 79) which is dated 4-1-15? Why is the updated version not submitted presently for the agenda item for the Board Members and Publics information?

Agenda

http://valleywater.org/About/ITAdHocAgendaMinutes.aspx


I WILL COME TO ANY MEETING AND SHOW YOU THE EQUIPMENT, THE PURCHASE PAPERS, AND SUPPLY  CONTRACTORS THAT WILL TELL YOU WE CAN SUPPORT THIS SYSTEM, OR WE INSTALLED THAT EQUIPMENT.
1. Has staff explained that the amx system can do voting, and request to speak as it does now. and that there is an open po with the programmer to have joystick control of ea camera,(( but not done as GK stopped work/SEE EMAIL)  Ask about the 10k of amx processing equipment gk had me buy before i retired/was forced out, but never installed)
2.  HD is not the answer as most people do not have fast internet connections and its bells  and whistles,  flat panels, you have flat panels.
3.  Has staff explained if you want to Skype you can do it now as the room is full of computers hooked to the system.  all you need is a staff person to handle it, that’s free, just download app, but you don’t need Skype, you have a video conferencing system(tandberg now Cisco)( can handle ip, isdn and phone calls  COST 77k$ per Larry wilson).


4.  Has staff told you that people can already call in as we installed a state of the art digital video conferencing system,  this equipment is still up to date.
5.  Has staff been truthful in say the system is 100 % analog no i replaced 75% of the audio and video processing so it is digital, as is the recording of the meetings  both video and audio.  This system can also record committee meetings, just turn cameras, and start recording. this is also digital video record, and audio is also captured on sd cards.  Also digital.
6.  HAS staff explained to you that we can do split screens, we can enlarge images, we can send, hook up and piece of equipment that comes into that board room, from digital to analog.
7. Has staff explained what the district cost will be, you cannot get that room to be rebuilt on 700k plus add the engineer’s cost, staff time already, and by the time the punch list is worked out it will be like the first board room where you sit costing over 2 million, you will want your own person running it not some temp/CONTRACTOR as is going to happen, but the sad thing is, yes its a nice room, but its not a room made for those types of meetings.
8.  This is my tax money just as much as yours, as Gary told ngoc why has nobody been fired, well why did George stop work in the board room, and not get fired? see the email in attachments.
why was George allowed to discuss with ray my marriage and medical problems, why  is George allowed to take av techs around the lake to tell them how things will be?
why has George been allowed to manipulate the techs, contractors and his staff, they are afraid of him.
9.  Has any of the staff told you that of 2 years ago the wireless microphone (frequencies) were sold by the FCC, which means that you could be fined, i told George of this before i left, as they did it with the original frequencies, so cell phones can have more bandwidth.
10.  I enjoyed working here but when the av MANAGEMENT cannot do there job, this is what happens.
11.  WHO IS PAYING FOR ELECTRICAL, WOODWORK, DRYWALL, PAINTING, BE SURE TO ADD THAT COST.
12.  IF PHIL IS A CTS WHY DID HE NOT SEE THE WIRELESS MICS WERE NOT SOLD OFF 2 YRS AGO MY THE FCC, ADD ANOTHER 20K, FOR  JUST 4 WIRELESS HANDHELDS AND LAVS?
13.  Staff Training: Clear Presentations & Mic Technique x OK Training/procedural Issue, MAYBE STAFF TRAINING AND A COUPLE OF UPGRADES IS ALL YOU NEED. Also what wrong with the beyer goosenecks, its what the board wanted, and if told how to use them they work fine.
14.  Simplify Rear Round Table  MOUNT CEILING THIS EQUIPMENT WAS BOUGHT IN 2011.
15..Provide Better Lighting From Front, Side and Back of Subjects x OK New cameras will operate better in low light conditions,  THE CAMERAS ARE FINE IS THE LIGHTING AS WAS TOLD TO TOM SPADA WHEN I WAS THERE.
16.  I WILL NOT EVEN BOTHER GOING OVER THE MATRIX AS MOST IF NOT ALL OF THAT CAN HAPPEN NOW.   IF YOU WOULD HAVE LISTEN TO THE AV TECH INPUTS (SEE HANDOUT), THEN MAYBE YOU MIGHT BE CLOSE.   I WISH YOU LUCK.   MOST IF NOT ALL OF THIS CAN HAPPEN NOW,  HOWEVER YOU HAVE NOT GOT THE RIGHT COSTS, NOR THE RIGHT ENGINEERS, NOR HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF THE USER’s, WHO STILL DON’T USE THE EQUIPMENT RIGHT. NOR HAVE YOU ASKED STAFF WHAT CAN THIS EQUIPMENT DO?
HURRY YOU STILL HAVE TIME TO ADD TO THE COST, FIGURE THE ACOUSTICS OUT, AND ASK HOW DID WE GET ENGINEERS WITH NO BOARDROOM EXPERIENCE.  Remember if you cannot grasp simple equipment, how will you manage higher tech?
Does staff and board  read employee reports, or any of the tapes, PR’s, expense reports etc.  we have provided links rebuttals but the board, managers just disregard the info, and keep wasting tax money.
 

AS DUG MUIRHEAD SAID YES I SAW THE SYSTEM break, SO IT SHOULD BE REPLACED, WELL WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF THAT, GEORGE KAMENJATI STOPPED ALL WORK IN THE ROOM SO THINGS WILL FAIL, HE WOULD NOT EVEN LET RAY GO PICK UP THE TECH DRAWINGS FROM ME AT HOME, NOR GET ALL THE KEYS.

HAVE YOU LOOKED AT RGD NOT ONE BOARD ROOM

THIS ROOM IS UNIQUE, ANYONE CAN BUILD A ROOM
BUT THEY HAVE NOT ONE BOARDROOM UNDER THERE BELT.


http://rgdacoustics.com/index.php/projects/commercial/
THEY MIGHT BE ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERS, BUT SO WAS  MUZAK  AND SLATER AND ASSOCIATES, AND LOOK WHAT YOU GOT IN 1999.  THEY THEN SUB IT OUT TO A ONE MAN FIRM, THEN YOU HIRED GOELTZ TO FIX AND REPLACE MOST IF NOT ALL OF THE AUDIO AND VIDEO GEAR.
AS TO THE ENGINEER SAYING YOU WILL NEED 37 CONVERTERS IS JUST NOT TRUE, A TOP OF THE LINE CONVERTER CAN BE PLACED WITH THE TECH WHO WOULD HANDLE INPUTS OF VARIOUS DEVICES. AND A GOOD UNIT IN THE RACK TO HANDLE OTHER INPUTS IS ALL THAT IS REQUIRED.
THIS FIRM HAS BEEN PAID LIKE THE FIRST FIRM TO TELL THE IT DEPT AND YOU WANT YOU WANT, WHEN THIS IS INSTALLED IT WILL BE 5-10 YEARS OLD.  and there is no guarantee that hdmi,sd or whatever will be in favor.  Worry about the draught, add a couple of pieces and find out who stopped adding pieces so you can do a few of the things it cannot.
AND HAS THE ENGINEERS TOLD YOU HOW THEY PLAN TO USE THERE ACOUSTICAL EXPERIENCE, AND HOW THEY PLAN TO TRAIN THE END USER TO TALK INTO THE MICROPHONE, HAVE THEY ACCOUNTED FOR IMPROPER USE AND A BAD ROOM DESIGN?   
And them pushing you on this hdmi/sunshine act, is 100% wrong, you still have very old legacy computer systems, that are contracted out.  Again ask any local av company if this cannot be maintained and or repaired, it can, you do not need this level of upgrades, nor is 4k required, for the 100 people that watch.

AGAIN THIS COMPANY HAS BEEN PAID TO TELL YOU THIS BY NON OTHER THAN THE MANIPULATOR IN THE IT DEPT, AND UPPER STAFF.
 
again thank you
 paul goeltz

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=962&meta_id=105367

 paul addressing the board 12 2012 and hand out below title joe handout
attachments Attachment 2 Stakeholder Matrix  MOST IF NOT ALL CAN HAPPEN NOW. and not the current one.
https://vimeo.com/155258547 SCVWD MEETING NOTES MP3 06-22-15 IT Ad Hoc
Handouts-Agenda Item 5.2 READ WERE THE AV TECH WAS INVOLVED, BUT DISMISSED
https://pgoeltz.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/handouts-agenda-item-5-2.pdfscvwd ray 10 28 2014 EMAILS 062215 IT Ad Hoc Comm Mins  THE ONLY MEETING HELD and the asked for a 2nd meeting?? with rays input
scvwd ray RAYS REBUTTAL 10 28 14
SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014  SR AV TECH 10 28 14
 paul addressing the board 12 2012 ABOVE, and hand out below title joe handout 
DiversityAudit2012  GOOD READING EXPLAINS WHY SCVWD IS LIKE IT IS.

A Party!! Nothing surprises me here!!! From last nights video of the Board of Directors meeting, 3/8/2016 (Meeting starts 22:40)  ITEM 8.1 
http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1330&meta_id=151731

WHAT A DUMB B ITCH, JUST AS SICK AS GOVT PEOPLE THAT WASTE THE  TAXPAYERS MONEY AT FLIP OF SWITCH, WHY DOES NOT ONE COME, THEY DON’T GIVE A SHIT, AS THEY GOVT DOES NOT LISTEN!  OH MY MINDS FUCKED UP, WET MY PANTS LYING ABOUT TECHNOLOGY ISSUES, FALSE FLAG IF I EVER HEARD ONE EVEN IN LOCAL H2O POLITICS, SPEND TAXES

AND THE WINNER FOR THE LEAST CONVINCING PERFORMANCE GOES TOO….

“Oh I’m sorry- I don’t know why I am messing up tonight; maybe it was because we had some technologies issues tonight so I’m kind of blanking out on it.”
(“I think your right” someone shouts surrounded by laughter) Item 8.1 Audio Visual Upgrade!!” COME ON DOWN!!!

From the opening comments on Fluoridation in our drinking water (errr..Can we have a say on what poison we want to drink?? Thank You!) to this item… I wondered if I was watching a episode of Foul Ups, Bleeps and Blunders!!!??? LOL ..Wow!
And did the IT Manager really say “ the equipment …even thought not failing due to the good work of the av staff….”? Prior to this meeting, they stated the system has failed.

Hey if I can hear that online what is the problem in the room? ( “the sound box??” haha why not call it Boom Box!!??) Those meetings have agenda handouts for the public and I am certain they have hard copies at the Dias for all members. Perhaps their ipads have replaced the hard copies?? Reading the agenda, no one seemed to ask the important questions. Furthermore out of date documents were submitted and goes unnoticed by all. The conversation on this item left allot to be desired.

Black Electrical tape ( as mentioned by the director “does not indicate state of the art communications”) SHOULD NOT be a factor in a Full Audio Visual System Upgrade disguised as HD Broadcast with our tax payer monies of 600k either (Watch item 2.1 from 2014 . Link below ). At the end of the day WE ALL KNOW it will not just be 600k!!

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182&meta_id=127582

10 28 2014 MORE STAFF PERJURY THEMSELVES….

I watched the latest Board Meeting 3-8-16

Least convincing presentation award should go to Director Keagan . ” I don’t know why I’m messing up tonight… It’s Due to technologies issues tonight” Item 8.1 Boardroom HD broadcast system .. Come on down!!

Let’s staff blatantly present wrong info without any of the Directors taking them to task about . The agenda package has contradictions, do they not read this?

What is clear at the District is they don’t care about tax paying citizens voice, thank you ladies for speaking against fluoridation all these years ( can we have a say in what poison we drink ?? Thank you very much)

What is heard loud and clear with these meetings is , We don’t care about your voice and we will spend your monies how we see fit!
Thank you for your votes and your public funds!

 
THIS IS THE AUDIO NOTES OF LAST it AD HOC MEETING THEY WERE TO HAVE MANY
TO DECIDE THE LIES THIS  AUDIO TRANSCRIPT IS FULL OF SCVWD TELLING LIES, JUST LIKE BEAU WHO GOT FIRED FOR LYING SAD THING IS THIS GROUP IS ALL ELECTED BOARD MEMBERS, WE HAVE PROVEN THE IT DEPT LET THE ROOM FAIL SO THEY CAN SPEND ANOTHER 3 MILLION DURING DROUGHT, SOCIAL MEDIA FRIENDLY, LIKE THE BOARD IS GOING TO STOP IN THE MIDDLE OF MEETING TO TAKE A TWITTER QUESTION, PUBLIC COMMENT IS AT THE START, IF YOU CANNOT MAKE IT SEND EMAIL.
OR THAT ONLY 60K HAS BEEN SPENT WHEN THE ROOM COST OVER 3 MILLION AND I DID OVER 250K OF UPGRADES, GEORGE K TOOK THE TANDBERG vc SYSTEM OUT AND NEVER TOLD THE BOARD IT WAS PUT IN PER REQUEST FROM LARRY WILSON 70K.  SO SEE THE LIES DON’T STOP, FUNG, RAVI, JESASS(CAO) ASHU, GK THEY TELL THE CONTRACTOR WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO LIE, WANT TO KNOW WHY ONLY ONE CONTRACTOR SHOWED UP FOR THE AV BID, THEY DON’T WANT TO DEAL WITH PSYCHOPATHS .  I CAN GO ON AND ON  I MADE THE ROOM DIGITAL, PUT ASSISTED LISTENING, AMX CAN HANDLE VOTING AS GK SAW THE DEMO, AND IF THEY LET THE TECHS DO THE AV NOT THE STAFF AND START MAINTENANCE, THINGS WOULD WORK, THERE IS OPEN PO’S FOR ANDERSON ENGINEERING FOR AMX WORK, GK BOUGHT OVER 50K OF GEAR FOR MODERNIZATION AND IT SITS.  IF YOU LOOK AT THE PDF OF REQUEST FOR MIC TRAINING NO ONE PERSON ASKED FOR IT WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF MOST PROBLEMS AUDIO WISE, YOU DON’T SPEAK SIDEWAYS INTO MIC.
BACKGROUND: The Boardroom’s audiovisual system was designed in 1997 and built in 2000. (UPGRADED UP TILL 2012 UNTIL GK STOPPED WORK ASK THE AV TECH, OVER 250K SPENT) In addition to the board’s own public meetings, the existing system is used for the District’s many internal divisional, unit, and group meetings, and frequently for other general district and community events of a business, educational, outreach, or celebratory nature. The existing legacy analog-based audiovisual system, uses technology designed over 17 years ago and does not provide for enhanced features of an e-voting ( AMX WILL HANDLE E VOTING AS EA MEMBER ALREADY HAS A AMX SCREEN FOR VOTING)and high resolution multi-screen (ALREADY HAVE MULTI SCREEN AND HD IS A WASTE WHEN 1024X 768 IS BEST) viewing, archiving, editing, casting and streaming of digital audio and video signals. ( SYSTEM IS ALREADY DIGITAL AND DIGITALLY RECORDED BOTH AUDIO AND VIDEO IN 2 DIGITAL FORMATS,)This system is not capable of integrating a sophisticated digital e-voting system and related (ALL LIES ITS ALL SET UP AND JUST NEEDS PROGRAMMING AS ANY NEW SYSTEM WOULD)features, nor does it have enough capacity or compatibility to provide for additional multi-signal switching of wired and wireless digital devices that can accommodate multi-scenario featured meetings. The existing system requires dedicated staff resources to insure basic operation during board meetings. ( ANY AV SYSTEM IS JUST LIKE A CONCERT A CREW IS REQUIRED WHO IS GOING TO WORK THE TWITTER FEED?)The reliability of this aged system is unpredictable and on many occasions has experienced audiovisual devices and power-related deficiencies and failures. Because of the new features requirements, technology limitations and exiting issues, the Project scope will completely overhaul the AV system and provide for a modern electronic voting system. THE SYSTEM WOULD WORK FINE WITH TRAINING AND ASK THE TECH TO TELL YOU WHAT THE SYSTEM CAN DO, GK STOPPED WORK SO THEY CAN REBUILD THEY SAY 900K ITS MORE LIKE ANOTHER 3 MILLION, AS THEY ARE NOT INCLUDING SCVWD STAFF TIME
http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55522/AS55533/AI55560/DO55650/DO_55650.pdf     this report is all based on lies and untruths dont believe the sr tech ask fired temps or the av tech.

AS DUG MUIRHEAD SAID YES I SAW THE SYSTEM FAIL, SO IT SHOULD BE REPLACED, WELL WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF THAT, GEORGE KAMENJATI STOPPED ALL WORK IN THE ROOM SO THINGS WILL FAIL, HE WOULD NOT EVEN LET RAY GO PICK UP THE TECH DRAWINGS FROM ME AT HOME, NOR GET ALL THE KEYS.

Attachment 1 Engineer’s Letter  NEW REPORT 2 2016

Attachment 2 Stakeholder Matrix  MOST IF NOT ALL CAN HAPPEN NOW.

BTW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MATRIX WORKED ON BY THE AV TECH?

Handouts-Agenda Item 5.2 READ WERE THE AV TECH WAS INVOLVED, BUT DISMISSED

 

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55522/AS55533/AI55560/DO55650/DO_55650.pdf

062215 IT Ad Hoc Comm Mins  THE ONLY MEETING HELD NO PUBLIC AND WHOLE REPORT IS BASED ON LIES.

Handouts-Agenda Item 5.2 AV TECH REBUTTAL MORE FUNNY STUFF. read this from av tech.

P Goeltz Release (1) THEY WANT ME TO SIGN THIS FOR MY MISSING STUFF AND BE QUITE ABOUT THE BOARDROOM LIES.

scvwd ray RAYS REBUTTAL 10 28 14

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014  SR AV TECH 10 28 14

Resolution Providing for the Notice of Time and Place of the Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for the Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization GOLDIE FUNG KAMENJATI  THIS IS PURE LIES, WHY THEY PERSIST ON NOT LISTENING TO  SR TECH AND LISTENING TO LIES LEARNED BY MANAGERS FROM BEAU.

JOE HANDOUT INFO ON BOARDROOM SENT TO JOE JUDGE ALERTING HIM AND OTHERS OF FRAUD ETC.

DiversityAudit2012  GOOD READING EXPLAINS WHY SCVWD IS LIKE IT IS.

 

AUDIO FROM THE ONLY MEETING HELD, ENGINEER LIES AND ASHU LIES CAN BE DOWN LOADED HERE. or watch video i made with rebuttal    …

https://vimeo.com/155258547 SCVWD MEETING NOTES MP3 06-22-15 IT Ad Hoc

https://scvwd.egnyte.com/fl/bpxZ1qv1v9#folder-link/rstewart/06-22-15%20IT%20Ad%20Hoc

 

PLEASE LISTEN TO THE TECH OR ME AND I CAN EXPLAIN WHAT IS INSTALLED HOW AMX CAN HANDLE VOTING AND HOW SYSTEM IS ALREADY SOCIAL MEDIA FRIENDLY.

I CAN EXPLAIN HOW MUCH HAS BEEN SPENT AND WERE THE EQUIPMENT IS. AS CAN THE  AV TECH

SCVWD SELLING ART WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS????

ARTWORK SCVWD SUPPORTS DURING DROUGHT????

Boardroom Audio Visual Modernization Project Engineer’s Report.

THIS IS THE AUDIO NOTES OF LAST it AD HOC MEETING THEY WERE TO HAVE MANY

https://scvwd.egnyte.com/fl/bpxZ1qv1v9#folder-link/rstewart/06-22-15%20IT%20Ad%20Hoc ad hoc folder

TO DECIDE THE LIES THIS  AUDIO TRANSCRIPT IS FULL OF SCVWD TELLING LIES, JUST LIKE BEAU WHO GOT FIRED FOR LYING SAD THING IS THIS GROUP IS ALL ELECTED BOARD MEMBERS, WE HAVE PROVEN THE IT DEPT LET THE ROOM FAIL SO THEY CAN SPEND ANOTHER 3 MILLION DURING DROUGHT, SOCIAL MEDIA FRIENDLY, LIKE THE BOARD IS GOING TO STOP IN THE MIDDLE OF MEETING TO TAKE A TWITTER QUESTION, PUBLIC COMMENT IS AT THE START, IF YOU CANNOT MAKE IT SEND EMAIL.

OR THAT ONLY 60K HAS BEEN SPENT WHEN THE ROOM COST OVER 3 MILLION AND I DID OVER 250K OF UPGRADES, GEORGE K TOOK THE TANDBERG vc SYSTEM OUT AND NEVER TOLD THE BOARD IT WAS PUT IN PER REQUEST FROM LARRY WILSON 70K.  SO SEE THE LIES DON’T STOP, FUNG, RAVI, JESASS(CAO) ASHU, GK THEY TELL THE CONTRACTOR WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO LIE, WANT TO KNOW WHY ONLY ONE CONTRACTOR SHOWED UP FOR THE AV BID, THEY DON’T WANT TO DEAL WITH PSYCHOPATHS .  I CAN GO ON AND ON  I MADE THE ROOM DIGITAL, PUT ASSISTED LISTENING, AMX CAN HANDLE VOTING AS GK SAW THE DEMO, AND IF THEY LET THE TECHS DO THE AV NOT THE STAFF AND START MAINTENANCE, THINGS WOULD WORK, THERE IS OPEN PO’S FOR ANDERSON ENGINEERING FOR AMX WORK, GK BOUGHT OVER 50K OF GEAR FOR MODERNIZATION AND IT SITS.  IF YOU LOOK AT THE PDF OF REQUEST FOR MIC TRAINING NO ONE PERSON ASKED FOR IT WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF MOST PROBLEMS AUDIO WISE, YOU DON’T SPEAK SIDEWAYS INTO MIC.

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55522/AS55533/AI55560/DO55650/DO_55650.pdf  LISTEN TO THESE LIES

BACKGROUND: The Boardroom’s audiovisual system was designed in 1997 and built in 2000. (UPGRADED UP TILL 2012 UNTIL GK STOPPED WORK ASK THE AV TECH, OVER 250K SPENT) In addition to the board’s own public meetings, the existing system is used for the District’s many internal divisional, unit, and group meetings, and frequently for other general district and community events of a business, educational, outreach, or celebratory nature. The existing legacy analog-based audiovisual system, uses technology designed over 17 years ago and does not provide for enhanced features of an e-voting ( AMX WILL HANDLE E VOTING AS EA MEMBER ALREADY HAS A AMX SCREEN FOR VOTING)and high resolution multi-screen (ALREADY HAVE MULTI SCREEN AND HD IS A WASTE WHEN 1024X 768 IS BEST) viewing, archiving, editing, casting and streaming of digital audio and video signals. ( SYSTEM IS ALREADY DIGITAL AND DIGITALLY RECORDED BOTH AUDIO AND VIDEO IN 2 DIGITAL FORMATS,)This system is not capable of integrating a sophisticated digital e-voting system and related (ALL LIES ITS ALL SET UP AND JUST NEEDS PROGRAMMING AS ANY NEW SYSTEM WOULD)features, nor does it have enough capacity or compatibility to provide for additional multi-signal switching of wired and wireless digital devices that can accommodate multi-scenario featured meetings. The existing system requires dedicated staff resources to insure basic operation during board meetings. ( ANY AV SYSTEM IS JUST LIKE A CONCERT A CREW IS REQUIRED WHO IS GOING TO WORK THE TWITTER FEED?)The reliability of this aged system is unpredictable and on many occasions has experienced audiovisual devices and power-related deficiencies and failures. Because of the new features requirements, technology limitations and exiting issues, the Project scope will completely overhaul the AV system and provide for a modern electronic voting system. THE SYSTEM WOULD WORK FINE WITH TRAINING AND ASK THE TECH TO TELL YOU WHAT THE SYSTEM CAN DO, GK STOPPED WORK SO THEY CAN REBUILD THEY SAY 900K ITS MORE LIKE ANOTHER 3 MILLION, AS THEY ARE NOT INCLUDING SCVWD STAFF TIME

https://scvwd.egnyte.com/fl/bpxZ1qv1v9#folder-link/rstewart/06-22-15%20IT%20Ad%20Hoc

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55522/AS55533/AI55560/DO55650/DO_55650.pdf     this report is all based on lies and untruths dont believe the sr tech ask fired temps or the av tech.

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55522/AS55533/AI55560/DO55650/DO_55650.pdf

A Party!! Nothing surprises me here!!! From last nights video of the Board of Directors meeting, 3/8/2016 (Meeting starts 22:40)  ITEM 8.1 
http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1330&meta_id=151731

WHAT A DUMB BITCH, JUST AS SICK AS GOVT PEOPLE THAT WASTE THE  TAXPAYERS MONEY AT FLIP OF SWITCH, WHY DOES NOT ONE COME, THEY DON’T GIVE A SHIT, AS THEY GOVT DOES NOT LISTEN!  OH MY MINDS FUCKED UP, WET MY PANTS LYING ABOUT TECHNOLOGY ISSUES, FALSE FLAG IF I EVER HEARD ONE EVEN IN LOCAL H2O POLITICS, SPEND TAXES

AND THE WINNER FOR THE LEAST CONVINCING PERFORMANCE GOES TOO….

“Oh I’m sorry- I don’t know why I am messing up tonight; maybe it was because we had some technologies issues tonight so I’m kind of blanking out on it.”
(“I think your right” someone shouts surrounded by laughter) Item 8.1 Audio Visual Upgrade!!” COME ON DOWN!!!

From the opening comments on Fluoridation in our drinking water (errr..Can we have a say on what poison we want to drink?? Thank You!) to this item… I wondered if I was watching a episode of Foul Ups, Bleeps and Blunders!!!??? LOL ..Wow!
And did the IT Manager really say “ the equipment …even thought not failing due to the good work of the av staff….”? Prior to this meeting, they stated the system has failed.

Hey if I can hear that online what is the problem in the room? ( “the sound box??” haha why not call it Boom Box!!??) Those meetings have agenda handouts for the public and I am certain they have hard copies at the Dias for all members. Perhaps their ipads have replaced the hard copies?? Reading the agenda, no one seemed to ask the important questions. Furthermore out of date documents were submitted and goes unnoticed by all. The conversation on this item left allot to be desired.

Black Electrical tape ( as mentioned by the director “does not indicate state of the art communications”) SHOULD NOT be a factor in a Full Audio Visual System Upgrade disguised as HD Broadcast with our tax payer monies of 600k either (Watch item 2.1 from 2014 . Link below ). At the end of the day WE ALL KNOW it will not just be 600k!!

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182&meta_id=127582

10 28 2014 MORE STAFF PERJURY THEMSELVES….

I watched the latest Board Meeting 3-8-16

Least convincing presentation award should go to Director Keagan . ” I don’t know why I’m messing up tonight… It’s Due to technologies issues tonight” Item 8.1 Boardroom HD broadcast system .. Come on down!!

Let’s staff blatantly present wrong info without any of the Directors taking them to task about . The agenda package has contradictions, do they not read this?

What is clear at the District is they don’t care about tax paying citizens voice, thank you ladies for speaking against fluoridation all these years ( can we have a say in what poison we drink ?? Thank you very much)

What is heard loud and clear with these meetings is , We don’t care about your voice and we will spend your monies how we see fit!
Thank you for your votes and your public funds!

 
THIS IS THE AUDIO NOTES OF LAST it AD HOC MEETING THEY WERE TO HAVE MANY
TO DECIDE THE LIES THIS  AUDIO TRANSCRIPT IS FULL OF SCVWD TELLING LIES, JUST LIKE BEAU WHO GOT FIRED FOR LYING SAD THING IS THIS GROUP IS ALL ELECTED BOARD MEMBERS, WE HAVE PROVEN THE IT DEPT LET THE ROOM FAIL SO THEY CAN SPEND ANOTHER 3 MILLION DURING DROUGHT, SOCIAL MEDIA FRIENDLY, LIKE THE BOARD IS GOING TO STOP IN THE MIDDLE OF MEETING TO TAKE A TWITTER QUESTION, PUBLIC COMMENT IS AT THE START, IF YOU CANNOT MAKE IT SEND EMAIL.
OR THAT ONLY 60K HAS BEEN SPENT WHEN THE ROOM COST OVER 3 MILLION AND I DID OVER 250K OF UPGRADES, GEORGE K TOOK THE TANDBERG vc SYSTEM OUT AND NEVER TOLD THE BOARD IT WAS PUT IN PER REQUEST FROM LARRY WILSON 70K.  SO SEE THE LIES DON’T STOP, FUNG, RAVI, JESASS(CAO) ASHU, GK THEY TELL THE CONTRACTOR WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO LIE, WANT TO KNOW WHY ONLY ONE CONTRACTOR SHOWED UP FOR THE AV BID, THEY DON’T WANT TO DEAL WITH PSYCHOPATHS .  I CAN GO ON AND ON  I MADE THE ROOM DIGITAL, PUT ASSISTED LISTENING, AMX CAN HANDLE VOTING AS GK SAW THE DEMO, AND IF THEY LET THE TECHS DO THE AV NOT THE STAFF AND START MAINTENANCE, THINGS WOULD WORK, THERE IS OPEN PO’S FOR ANDERSON ENGINEERING FOR AMX WORK, GK BOUGHT OVER 50K OF GEAR FOR MODERNIZATION AND IT SITS.  IF YOU LOOK AT THE PDF OF REQUEST FOR MIC TRAINING NO ONE PERSON ASKED FOR IT WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF MOST PROBLEMS AUDIO WISE, YOU DON’T SPEAK SIDEWAYS INTO MIC.
Advertisements

SCVWD, GOLDEN GOLDIE TO RESIGN -for-job-in-afghanistan/, RMC FRAUD, BOARDROOM,

In a democracy, people get
the government they deserve.

 – Adlai Stevenson

Dear World Watcher,

Have you ever spent a few minutes watching the plane crash videos of 9/11/01? If not, you should. The videos are fake. Here are a few of the most obvious ones:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcQWaTRPbQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cvWwIxMbmE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSDfbm8OhCg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6bk4dMjl4g

That day I recorded on the vcr about 8 hours of the live news coverage, beginning just before the first Twin Tower blew up. Anyone can study the video and see that many of the witnesses were bad actors, the plane crashes are fake, and explosives (not planes) blew up the buildings. This is similar to Col. L. Fletcher Prouty’s description in chapter 3 of his 1992 book JFK. He explains how tens of thousands of people worldwide train for these types of operations on a daily basis.

This guy here, dressed up as a construction worker, is a real giveaway:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAzzHjLYjuA

Of the 1.6 million people in Manhattan that day, the A-number-one witness to the event just happens to drive by a Fox News reporter and tell what he saw.

Here is another obvious actor, this one at the Pentagon:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PTRsuRao7A

And this guy is just plane comical:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14

In the video September Clues they highlight some of the actors of that day:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BvmdWAIs14

This person appears to miss his cue when upstaged by a passerby Fox News wasn’t expecting. The actor (carrying a large bag) turns around and walks back towards the Trade Center, then comes back for his lengthy interview (interview not included here):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0eC3uns3pA

At the end of the above video CNN shows us a close-up view of the North Tower (building to the right) before it was blown up. Much of the plane’s “entrance hole” is unbroken. Also some of the beams at the upper right are jutting outward, not inward. Fake pictures on the internet and in television documentaries show a larger and more believable hole in the building. They even added some people standing in the hole!

For a very good view of what the North Tower really looked like before it was blown up go to http://wtc.vjs.organd click on “Tower 2 fireball”. Also, at the tail end of that video clip you can see a helicopter or plane in the background. In none of the fake plane crash videos do we see a helicopter or plane there.

The official number of passengers on board the 3 planes that allegedly crashed is only a fraction of the number of passengers normally on such flights. In fact, flight 93 that supposedly crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania had only 37 passengers. Just one of the many indications this was fake.

After 5pm many of the news stations began airing video clips of the 47-story WTC #7 collapsing. Nobody bothers to mention that this was obviously a controlled demolition; no apparent damage to the building as it falls like a house of cards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk

At 11:07am (eastern time) CNN’s Aaron Brown talks on the telephone with CNN’s Alan Dodds Frank who is in lower Manhattan. Frank apparently reports that a third building collapsed at 10:45. He said it happened 15 minutes after the collapse of the North Tower (10:28) and a firefighter estimated 50 stories fell. When viewing this clip notice that Brown doesn’t ask which building fell; why it fell; or, were there people in or around the building. When Frank is done with his report Brown casually moves on and changes the subject! Shortly after this conversation the timeclock underneath the CNN logo disappears and is never displayed again.

(One possible explanation for this mix-up is that the 47-story WTC #7 was scheduled to be blown up around the same time as the Twin Towers, but for some reason they postponed it to later in the day. Poor Mr. Frank wasn’t informed of this last minute change of plan and he went on to read his well-rehearsed script at the wrong time.)

Fox News reporter Jeff Goldblatt interviews a photographer, live, at Shanksville. The photographer says all he could see was a 10ft. x 15-20ft. ditch, smoke, and some broken trees. “Nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there.” The video of the crash site clearly shows that no plane crashed there.

Early footage of the Pentagon before the wall and roof collapsed. Firemen hose down the fire that can be seen inside the building through the windows. One guy with a broom is sweeping. (Where is the plane?)

KTVU Channel 2 (local Oakland, Calif. station) correspondent Mike Majchrowitz reports live from the Pentagon. He says that a little after 10am the smoke seemed to be going down and then there was a set of explosions and it turned black again. He also says he hasn’t yet seen an eyewitness to the crash.

C-span interviews a Pentagon employee in her car. She says, “The building shook. I was in the building and that last bomb threat [sic] they just had, it shook the building. I left.”

CNN’s Jamie McIntyre reports live from the Pentagon. He says there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon; no large sections of wing, tail, or fuselage visible.

The initial report of hijackers with knives and box-cutters on Flight 77 allegedly came from Barbara Olson using a phone on the plane. She just happened to be married to Solicitor General Ted Olson who argued President Bush’s election case before the Florida State Supreme Court in 2000. What a small world.

How did it happen that an entire country could be tricked into believing something so dumb that a 10-year-old kid can figure it out? William Shirer wrote about this sort of thing in “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.” He described what it was like being in Nazi Germany, and no matter how silly or retarded the Nazi news propaganda was, the gullible German public swallowed it up, hook, line, and sinker.

Shirer wrote:

    I myself was to experience how easily one is taken in by a lying and censored press and radio in a totalitarian state. Though unlike most Germans I had daily access to foreign newspapers, especially those of London, Paris and Zurich, which arrived the day after publication, and though I listened regularly to the BBC and other foreign broadcasts, my job necessitated the spending of many hours a day in combing the German press, checking the German radio, conferring with Nazi officials and going to party meetings. It was surprising and sometimes consternating to find that notwithstanding the opportunities I had to learn the facts and despite one’s inherent distrust of what one learned from Nazi sources, a steady diet over the years of falsifications and distortions made a certain impression on one’s mind and often misled it. No one who has not lived for years in a totalitarian land can possibly conceive how difficult it is to escape the dread consequences of a regime’s calculated and incessant propaganda. Often in a German home or office or sometimes in a casual conversation with a stranger in a restaurant, a beer hall, a cafe, I would meet with the most outlandish assertions from seemingly educated and intelligent persons. It was obvious that they were parroting some piece of nonsense they had heard on the radio or read in the newspapers. Sometimes one was tempted to say as much, but on such occasions one was met with such a stare of incredulity, such a shock of silence, as if one had blasphemed the Almighty, that one realized how useless it was even to try to make contact with a mind which had become warped and for whom the facts of life had become what Hitler and Goebbels, with their cynical disregard for truth, said they were.

For many years Mae Brussell exposed just how and why the traditional domestic U.S. eastern establishment powers, such as the Rockefellers and Kennedys, are being wiped out by the more sadistic, foreign interests infiltrating the United States (essentially the same people we were fighting during WWII). And on September 11, 2001 the World Trade Center was blown up littered with jokes and comedy acts for anyone who bothers to look. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXcQWaTRPbQ

For those interested in understanding what led up to this I would recommend the following books:

If you have trouble finding the books try http://www.addall.com or http://www.ebay.com. (Also on ebay people occasionally sell 9/11/01 television coverage they recorded that day.)

Good luck,

Tim Canale

Water District CEO Rushes Big-Dollar Consulting Contract, Fails to Disclose Conflicts of Interest

As California prepares, in its fourth dry year, for all manner of apocalyptic scenarios—from rapidly depleted drinking water sources to Dust Bowl-era dirt farms—the thought of Silicon Valley devolving into a waterless sinkhole is “what I lose sleep over at night,” the region’s chief water official says.

As CEO of the Santa Clara Valley Water District, which provides flood protection and water to 1.8 million people in Silicon Valley’s largest county, Beau Goldie is especially concerned with subsidence—the depletion of groundwater basins that could destabilize the region’s supply and, down the road, puncture the landscape with street-swallowing pits. These concerns, he says, prompted him to take emergency action this spring and seek approval on an exclusive contract with RMC, a company that is expected to draw up plans for a recycling plant to replenish the valley’s fragile groundwater.

But sources within the water district say Goldie has routinely avoided disclosing potential conflicts of interest regarding RMC, the beneficiary of more than $18 million from the water district in the last decade.

The latest agreement with the company, expected to come in at more than $4 million, has for the most part escaped public scrutiny. In April, the seven-member elected Board of Directors, on a 5-2 vote, gave Goldie the green light to negotiate a single-source contract, which means competitive vendors were not even in the running. Goldie said a surprisingly dry winter gave rise to the fast track contracting process.

“Just about every month counts here,” Goldie told San Jose Inside. “We’re in a race.”

What Goldie never disclosed to the board is the cozy relationship the water district has shared with RMC for a number of years.

Melanie Richardson, one of Goldie’s top ranking deputies and the person responsible for overseeing watershed contracts for the district, is married to one of RMC’s principal owners, Tom Richardson. In a statement of economic interest form filed for 2010,Melanie Richardson noted that she held stock in the company worth between $100,000 and $1 million.

Goldie also neglected to inform board members that last year Monterey County Water Agency board member Steve Collins pleaded no contest to public corruption charges, including felony grand theft, related to payments from RMC and an artichoke grower. Collins worked as a paid consultant for the company and also voted on its contracts as an elected official. Collins also illegally billed clients $160,000 for meetings that he didn’t attend, or which were part of his duties as a public official, prosecutors said.

Gary Kremen, chair of the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) and one of only two board members to vote against RMC’s contract, called the single-source negotiations with RMC “bad planning on an epic proportion.”

“It’s not like a dam is breaking and we need to immediately plug a hole,” Kremen said. “A couple months aren’t going to kill us. It’s going to take up to 10 years to get drops of water from a recycling plant into the groundwater.

“It’s starting out on the absolute wrong foot. We’ve known about this purified water project for years. We’ve had way more time to make disclosures about RMC’s past behavior, and those disclosures were never made.”

Goldie defended RMC’s selection, and the decision to exclude details about Collins and the Richardsons when going to the board for approval. He admitted that the SCVWD conducted no additional research into RMC’s role in Collins’ indictment. “It would just slow down processes tremendously, and we wouldn’t be able to provide any more assurances,” Goldie said.

In the case of Melanie Richardson’s potential conflict of interest, Goldie said that a “firewall” was put in place years ago to keep her from coming into contact with actions related to her husband’s company.

“Melanie is in the flood protection side of the house, so she has no involvement in this whatsoever,” Goldie said.

But sources at the water district tell San Jose Inside this hasn’t always been the case. In fact, internal documents show that Richardson has managed people who handle RMC contracts, including their performance reviews. The “firewall” appears to rely on her walking out of the room when RMC is discussed.

“It doesn’t pass the smell test,” said a source with decades of experience overseeing contracts between public agencies and consultants.

Sources confirmed that the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s office looked into the matter two years ago, but the investigation was called off due to an impending statute of limitations for any potential charges.

Goldie insisted in a May interview with San Jose Inside that an in-house ethics expert, LeeAnn Pelham, had strengthened SCVWD controls to prevent any impropriety. Pelham subsequently resigned her post.

RMC’s single-source contract was part of a package of non-competitive deals Goldie submitted at an April 28 board meeting. He received pushback not only from Kremen and fellow director Barbara Keegan, but also Ravi Subramanian, the district’s head of procurement.

“I just said the language needs to be stronger to justify why they should be single-source contracts,” Subramanian told San Jose Inside in a phone interview monitored by district communications staff.

The RMC deal earmarks several million dollars worth of preliminary planning for an indirect potable recycling plant, but Goldie said that the overall project could end up costing $800 million. Sources say that estimate is optimistic, as the water district has a history of going over budget.

District board member Keegan, a trained engineer who along with Kremen voted against Goldie’s single-source contract proposals, noted that companies doing preliminary planning often receive ensuing contracts. Engineers rarely trust work they have not verified themselves.

“Whoever does the preliminary engineering work obviously is going to have more experience with the project and that would help in the future for a final design contract,” Keegan said. “If another firm were chosen for the design, they would have to redo significant portions of the preliminary engineering to verify the accuracy of the other firm’s work product.”

Goldie said that RMC has been notified it is unlikely to receive future contracts on the project, making the decision to go with the company from the start all the more perplexing.

“That means, potentially, the $5 million being spent on this preliminary contract would be wasted if another firm were chosen to finish off the project,” Keegan said.

Beyond the proposed RMC contract, sources say the firm has improperly billed the district in the past. Sources also told San Jose Inside that a recent audit found that district staff has routinely moved money between projects, sometimes to the benefit of RMC, and these transfers of funds are tucked into massive reports that often go undetected by the part-time board members.

“By moving funds directly from project to project, it avoids scrutiny from the public and the Board,” Keegan said.

Board chair Kremen said he plans to call on Goldie to suspend negotiations with RMC until a more thorough vetting of their past dealings with the district can be conducted.

Josh Koehn is the news editor for San Jose Inside and Metro Newspaper. Email tips tojosh@metronews.com or follow him on Twitter at @Josh_Koehn.

14 Comments

  1. RMC had the 3 year contract for the SBWR Master Plan (Google it!). This contract was just completed in April and was co-managed by the City of San Jose and the Water District. RMC knows the issues with recycled water in the valley, I do not see what the problem is here. Everyone at the top levels of government has their “hands in the kitty”, how else did they get elected or promoted? Why is this such a surprise what the Water District did?

    I would be interested to hear what Mr. Wall has to say about this nefariousness.

  2. Beau Goldie and John Gundry–cut from the same cloth. Who has the authority to terminate each of these two, and why haven’t they exercised that authority? Our smithy may be resigned to the inevitability of corruption at the top, but I am not.

  3. @Josh_Koehn. look into what they are doing to the board room, wasting millions and no one gets fired for breaking it so they can waste more money, have all the documentation.@pgoeltz this is district wide waste they even paid for sig hearing aid over 5k, when hes a rich farmer,, as to the problem, they funnel money how and where they want this is just tip of waste there.

  4. Its your taX money they don’t care ask to see all the prs from all departments you will see waste and same style, hiring friends, no bid, IT ADHOC, COMMITTEE IS A JOKE TO GET A NEW 3 MILLION BOARDROOM
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH. FUNNY 2 COPS THERE THAT NIGHT. GOOGLE BOARD ROOM AND DOCUMENTS, THEY DISREGARD THE TRUTH.

    item 2.1 timestamp 16.51-over 45 mn long

    http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182

    2.1 Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization Project; Resolution to Approve the Engineer’s Report and Project; Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids, Project No. 60204016 (San Jose). (S. Tikekar)

    http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182

    http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55587/AS55593/AS55594/AI55663/DO55863/DO_55863.pdf
    http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55587/AS55593/AS55594/AI55663/DO55864/DO_5586

  5. The Santa Clara County D.A. is at least partly right. That Form 700 for 2010, filed on 3/18/2011, is outside the four-year statute of limitations in California Gov Code subsection 91011(b). You’ve checked her filings for 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, right?

    There might’ve been a violation of 91005(b), which allows treble damages. Section 91009 says a plaintiff is entitled to half of the penalty.

  6. RMC are getting sole source contracts now from Milpitas and the District. And charges both exorbitant rates under the false pretense of being cheaper and more efficient. I think not. They are obviously conflicted and the District needs a trusted consultant at their side instead of them.

    • I retired from the district after seeing time and time again upper management playing favorites and protecting each other. This is just another example of that. Mr.Goldie and and Ms.Richardson both long term district employees, have no respect for the public. Does anyone really believe that Ms. Richardson “being on the other side of the house” makes the whole issue transparent?
      The solution is to replace Mr. Goldie with an outside professional without these long time personal relationships. Of course no one should be surprised to see Mr. Goldie land on his feet as a highly paid RMC employee.

  7. What? Say it isn’t so, a politician, a CEO, a public official, with a conflict of interest? I’m appalled and saddened. Let me say again, deeply saddened, OH!! but wait, this is America, never mind.

  8. For more information on the water board please have a look at the top of the MaeBrussell(dot)com homepage. Mr. Goldie is a choirboy when compared to the actual board members.

#SCVWD #VALLEYWATER.ORG #SANTACLARALLEYWATERDISTRICT @SCVWD @VALLEYWATER.ORG @SANTACLARALLEYWATERDISTRICT

#SCVWD #VALLEYWATER.ORG #SANTACLARALLEYWATERDISTRICT @SCVWD @VALLEYWATER.ORG @SANTACLARALLEYWATERDISTRICT   WHAT IS SAD IS EVEN PEOPLE LIKE DUG MUIRHEAD ARE SPEAKING UP AS TO WHERE THE MONEY IS GOING, CITING 2001 MASTER PLAN THAT HAS NEVER BEEN USED IN IT, THE NEW IT MANAGER THE 4TH IN AS MANY YEARS WAS TOLD NOTHING OF THE LIES AND MISINFORMATION DONE BY IT MANAGERS FRANK FUNG AND GEORGE KAMENJATI….@SCVWD   FEB 10TH MEETING AND LIES  SCVWD 911

@SCVWDhttp://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1195 time 4:19 watch the cio a fool of IT AGAIN THEY WOULD RATHER WASTE TAX MONEY THEN REPAIR @pgoeltz @IFUSIKAY 

ABOVE IS LATEST HATE TO JOKE ABOUT CIO, BUT GET A BETTER SPEAKER LIKE GEORGE K OR FRANK FUNG

BELOW IS SEPT 2014 WERE BLOW IT AGAIN

https://pgoeltz.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/golden-goldie-lies-scvwd-golden-spigot-crane-wreck-racialacid-scvwd/comment-page-1/

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH

Posted on November 2, 2014
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH. FUNNY 2 COPS THERE THAT NIGHT.

scvwd ray 10 28 2014 RAYS STORY  LOOK WHAT THE AV TECH HAS TO SAY ABOUT THINGS.  REMINDS ME OF THE AUDIT 2012 THEY HAD THAT EXPLAINS MANAGEMENTS BEHAVIOR. (READ IT. DiversityAudit2012

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014 PAULS STORY  MY STORY AND MY HANDOUT FROM  2012 WHEN WE FIRST BLEW THE WHISTLE, FUNNY AS THEY ALL JUST KEEP GOING WITH THE LIES.

SCVWD SELLING ART WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS????

TWO SPEECHES ON 10 28 2014 BUT GO TOVALLEYWATER.ORG AND WATCH THIS GUY DOUG……… JUST RIP THEM A NEW ASSHOLE

item 2.1   timestamp 16.51-over 45 mn long

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182

2.1          Public Hearing on the Engineer’s Report for Boardroom Audiovisual Modernization Project; Resolution to Approve the Engineer’s Report and Project; Adopt Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids, Project No. 60204016 (San Jose).  (S. Tikekar)

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1182

http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55587/AS55593/AS55594/AI55663/DO55863/DO_55863.pdf
http://cf.valleywater.org/About_Us/Board_of_directors/Board_meetings/_2014_Published_Meetings/MG55587/AS55593/AS55594/AI55663/DO55864/DO_5586
via SCVWD @SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BOARD ROOM UPGRADE

About these ads
Occasionally, some of your visitors may see an advertisement here.

Tell me more | Dismiss this message

SHARE THIS

scvwd ray 10 28 2014

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014

JOE HANDOUT

DiversityAudit2012

sscistudy1Featured Image — 31

THIS IS ASKING FOR 28 MILL FOR LIKE TOILET PAPER AQND BELOW THAT THE RISK MANAGER PERJURES HIMSELF FIRST OVER WELL I LET LEGAL HANDLE THAT

http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1190
Live and Recorded Public meetings of 01/13/2015 06:00 PM REGULAR MEETING for Santa Clara Valley Water District
want to see dumb and dumbier timestamp 1.47 @scvwd tries to get another 28 million liston to Mr Muirhead(about 1.48) rip beau, jesass, and the it manager a new asshole just like when they wanted 2 million for a new boardroom due to fung/kamenjati not fixing things, this is so funny these high paid idiots, this is your tax money they try to steal, look how stupid the it manager is, like they fired the first 3, where did they find this idiot… below is links from them asking for boardroom upgrades….

https://pgoeltz.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/golden-goldie-lies-scvwd-golden-spigot-crane-wreck-racialacid-scvwd/comment-page-1/#comment-786SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH
Posted on November 4, 2014

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH.

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH
Posted on November 2, 2014

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT LOOK LIKE FOOLS 10 28 14 LYING CAO CEO STAFF READ WATCH TRUTH. FUNNY 2 COPS THERE THAT NIGHT.

scvwd ray 10 28 2014 RAYS STORY  LOOK WHAT THE AV TECH HAS TO SAY ABOUT THINGS.  REMINDS ME OF THE AUDIT 2012 THEY HAD THAT EXPLAINS MANAGEMENTS BEHAVIOR. (READ IT. DiversityAudit2012

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014 PAULS STORY  MY STORY AND MY HANDOUT FROM  2012 WHEN WE FIRST BLEW THE WHISTLE, FUNNY AS THEY ALL JUST KEEP GOING WITH THE LIES.

go to link above to view pdf from meeting
01/13/2015 06:00 PM REGULAR MEETING – Jan 13th, 2015
scvwd.granicus.com
Live and Recorded Public meetings of 01/13/2015 06:00 PM REGULAR MEETING for Santa Clara Valley Water District
AGAIN WHAT IS SO HARD ABOUT WRITING ME BACK, A RETIRED EMPLOYEE, WHO IS SHOWING YOU YOUR MANAGERS ARE WRONG, NOT JUST I BUT OTHERS, AGAIN WHERE ARE MY THINGS SCVWD OR GEORGE TOSSED OUT, THAT DAVID AND I AGREED ON A AMOUNT ALREADY.  ITS FINE WHEN THE BOARD ROOM COMMITTEE CONNIVES, THEY WILL HEAR AND SEE ALL THE PO’S OF WASTE AND MORE MANIPULATION BY FRANK AND GEORGE.   NOT TO MENTION EVEN MORE PROOF WILL COME OUT FROM THE COMMITTEE.   FROM OLGA THROUGH JESUS YOU JUST PROTECT YOUR OWN READ THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY MYSELF AND OTHERS.  AND THERE IS MANY MORE, MORE THAN YOU WILL WANT TO SEE i WILL NOT REST UNTIL JUSTICE IS SERVED! AND I OFFERED YOU AN EASY WAY OUT NOW IT WILL GET BLOWN ALL OVER THE PUBLIC.

AGAIN THE AUDIT 2012 IS BELOW, SHOW’S THE SAME ACTIONS STILL GOING ON TODAY, BOTH THE TECH STATEMENT AND MORE PROOF OF GK MANIPULATIONS AND MINE FROM THE BOARD MEETING YOU REQUESTED MONEY TO REBUILD THE BR!   DOES THE PRESS KNOW THAT YOU ARE ON HOW MANY FIRED CIO IN HOW MANY YEARS?, WHY HAS NO ONE TOLD THE NEW CIO THE REAL TRUTH.

LOOK I JUST WANT THE FUNDS PROMISED ME, AND AS DAVID SAID SUPPLY ME WITH NAMES AND WE WILL INTERVIEW THEM, WELL ITS BEEN OVER 6 MONTHS, WILL WE WAIT UNTIL THE NEW BOARDROOM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETS, THEY WILL GET ALL RECORDS.  NOT ONE PERSON HAS REACHED OUT TO LISTEN TO ME AND ONLY SPEAKS TO THE GUILTY. AND WHAT HAS BECOME OF THE STATEMENT I HAVE TO PASS THIS ON TO ANNA NORIEGA, SHE HAS NOT INTERVIEWED ANY OF THE WITNESSES EITHER.  SEE NOW CITIZEN ARE STANDING UP LIKE MR. MUIRHEAD QUESTIONING THE MILLIONS IN IT MONEY, AND OTHER FUNDS AT THE DISTRICT, LIKE HIDING THE IT BUDGET IN CAPITOL PROJECTS??

 I WOULD LIKE WHAT WAS PROMISED, I WOULD LIKE YOU TO SEE WHY YOUR MANAGERS MANIPULATE , AND BRING AN END TO THIS MESS.  http://scvwd.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=3&clip_id=1195 time 4:19 watch the cio make a fool of IT AGAIN @SCVWD @VALLEYWATER THEY WOULD RATHER WASTE TAX MONEY THEN REPAIR

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:07 PM, paul goeltz <pgoeltz@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear SCVWD per David you already agreed to pay for my thrown away items,  see below.. I can supply the complete email trail, acting on good faith is interviewing workers that know, heard and were told things about me, this has not happened. YOU have repeatably asked for names which i provided, non have been interviewed, so how is this evidence?  Maybe we will just make it all public for Doug Muirhead to take apart and my lawyer, as i said i did not want to go there, but i have no other choice, i have asked over 25 times and all i see is brick wall

David Cahen <DCahen@valleywater.org>

8/19/14

   
to Stan, me

Paul:

 

Thanks for the email.  I spoke with several people in the IT unit, and it looks like they might have inadvertently thrown some of your things away.  That was the basis of the $1,300 offer.  In my discussions, it became clear to me that nothing was intentional, and that they were just trying to clear and clean.  As for the other issues, I can’t find any evidence of your manager breaching any confidentiality or intentionally telling someone about your medical condition.

 

The $1,300 offer still stands.  If you would like to accept the offer, please let me know.

 

Regards,

 

David Cahen

Risk Manager

Santa Clara Valley Water District

5750 Almaden Expressway,

San Jose, CA 95118

(408) 630-2213

Also i have been getting the run around on interviews which you asked for names… Dave i have given names and you have even more incriminating data on GK. from the September board meeting, emails etc.

David Cahen <DCahen@valleywater.org>

9/2/14

   
to me, Stan

Paul:

 

As I have said before, I am more than happy to look into specific allegations.  If you have names and specifics, please pass them on, and I will take appropriate action.  I have been acting in good faith in an attempt to figure out the basis for any allegations.  Any information you have that you believe would assist in this endeavor would be appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

David Cahen

Risk Manager

Santa Clara Valley Water District

5750 Almaden Expressway,

San Jose, CA 95118

(408) 630-2213

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Cahen <DCahen@valleywater.org> wrote:

Paul:

 

As I have said before, I am more than happy to look into specific allegations.  If you have names and specifics, please pass them on, and I will take appropriate action.  I have been acting in good faith in an attempt to figure out the basis for any allegations.  Any information you have that you believe would assist in this endeavor would be appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

David Cahen

Risk Manager

Santa Clara Valley Water District

5750 Almaden Expressway,

San Jose, CA 95118

(408) 630-2213

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:52 PM, paul goeltz <pgoeltz@gmail.com> wrote:

David you already said you would pay for items thrown away and Anna was looking into the info i provided about GK and who to interview, again from the board meeting ray provided the board with lots of incriminating evidence, and you asked for names of who to interview which i provided,  so again you already told me you would pay for what was tossed out of my things, and interview the techs, which has not happened.  I will be happy to come and present even more evidence before the board, and newspapers if scvwd wishes, AND PURSUE IN COURT. PRETTY SURE THE OFFER I MADE FOR gk MISCONDUCT WAS VERY FAIR.  AGAIN YOU ASKED I PROVIDE MORE NAMES AND EVIDENCE I DID AND THIS EVIDENCE OR PART WAS PRESENTED AT THE BOARD MEETING ALSO.  SO  WE DID AGREE ON A AMOUNT FOR MY PERSONAL ITEMS.  AND WILLING TO TALK ABOUT THE OTHER ISSUE…. BUT THE OFFER IS NOT  TO JUST DO NOTHING.  IT SEEMS I KEEP HAVING TO ASK WHATS GOING ON, WHEN I FEEL NOTHING IS.

PG

David Cahen <DCahen@valleywater.org>

9/2/14

   
to me, Stan

Paul:

 

As I have said before, I am more than happy to look into specific allegations.  If you have names and specifics, please pass them on, and I will take appropriate action.  I have been acting in good faith in an attempt to figure out the basis for any allegations.  Any information you have that you believe would assist in this endeavor would be appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

David Cahen

Risk Manager

Santa Clara Valley Water District

5750 Almaden Expressway,

San Jose, CA 95118

(408) 630-2213

 

From: paul goeltz [mailto:pgoeltz@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 10:49 AM
To: David Cahen
Subject: goeltz

 

So my personal items, the amount is fair, however what about the said manager telling false, misleading and my medical information to other scvwd workers?

I think or am very sure if you ask IT employee’s and other departments i worked for you will find the said manager guilty of the issue i sent in.  And this is also a larger issue with middle managers per audit 2012, and other lawsuits.  

Show less

Live and Recorded Public meetings of REGULAR MEETING for Santa Clara Valley Water District

SCVWD SELLING ART WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS???? EVEN TOLD DIRECTORS , CAO, CEO, CIO NOTHING JUST LIKE RICH LIES THIS AUDIT EXPLAINS THE ISSUE AT SCVWD LIES

SCVWD SELLING ART WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS????
EVEN TOLD DIRECTORS , CAO, CEO, CIO NOTHING JUST LIKE RICH LIES THIS AUDIT EXPLAINS THE ISSUE AT SCVWD LIES

sscistudy1

scvwd ray 10 28 2014

SCVWD PGOELTZ 10 28 2014

DiversityAudit2012